Here are your MiTeGen Hottest Tweets in SBDD, with mesmerizing protein machinery structures and...
cryoDuck Hottest Social in SBDD (01/2025)
Cryo-EM Twitter used to be an incredible place - a scientific hub chipping away at many of academia’s longstanding barriers. Suddenly, knowledge flowed at the speed of science, no longer tethered to glacial publication cycles or oversubscribed conference schedules. Younger scientists, normally buried in the back of lecture halls, could share their breakthroughs directly with global leaders. Peer mentoring flourished, careers took off, and researchers found a stage to showcase not just their data, but their authentic selves.
Perhaps the best part of Twitter was watching siloed sub-communities collide in real time - medical Twitter, biotech Twitter, chemistry Twitter, physics Twitter - coming together in ways the Ivory Tower rarely encourages. It was chaotic at times, sure, but it also broke down walls and sparked new ideas.
Then came Elon and the place practically went up in flames overnight. The issue with Elon runs deeper than mere politics; it’s a clash of cultures. As Nate Silver aptly pointed out , his Twitter acquisition magnified the divide between academia’s ethos and the “tech-bro” mindset that already existed:
Tech bro culture and academic/media culture compete for cultural hegemony in liberal spaces (emphatically including Twitter!) and he has all the markers of tech bro culture.
— Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) April 25, 2022
Disillusioned scientists (including many from cryo-EM Twitter) finally had enough and migrated to BlueSky, where conversations are slowly taking shape. Meanwhile, biotech Twitter is still holding on to X (formerly Twitter), leaving the rest of us toggling between multiple platforms - because apparently one social media feed just wasn’t exhausting enough.
Let’s face it: Who has the time to constantly monitor X, BlueSky, LinkedIn, and maybe even Mastodon (if you’re really committed) to avoid missing major research news or the occasional meltdown? That’s why cryoDuck is stepping in with a new monthly series, “The Hottest Social in SBDD,” launching in 2025. We’ll sift through the noise to bring you the most compelling posts, insights, and breakthroughs across platforms, saving you from a never-ending cycle of app-hopping.
And we’re off to a big start. January’s buzz alone included spectacular cryo-EM structures that captured how HIV capsids don't stop at nuclear pores instead breaking them, a revolutionary breakthrough in protein purification via microfluidics, eye-popping new stats from the Protein Data Bank, and some spirited debates on industry resilience and investment trends. If this is how 2025 begins, it’s safe to say we have a very interesting year ahead. Strap in, and let cryoDuck keep you on top of what matters—no matter which social media kingdom claims your attention this week.
Target structures and wonderful proteins
Tell me again that structural biologists are near extinction because of AI. We are just getting started! 💪🏾
— Chrystal Starbird (@drstarbird.bsky.social) January 18, 2025 at 4:09 PM
[image or embed]
Molecular mechanisms of inverse agonism via κ-opioid receptor–G protein complexes | Nat Chem Biolhttps://t.co/wjRtJrdwNW pic.twitter.com/cQovYCKwpW
— Membrane Protein PDB (@MemProtPDB) January 15, 2025
Structural insights into the regulation of monomeric and dimeric apelin receptorhttps://t.co/lsA7tnZSnD
— Cheers (@raintank2010) January 7, 2025
Lipids modulate open probability of RyR1 under cryo-EM conditions | bioRxivhttps://t.co/QRz8v8wWXx pic.twitter.com/H0IMrW5hZp
— Membrane Protein PDB (@MemProtPDB) December 26, 2024
Ever wondered how transcription choreographs histone modifications? Our work reveals the basis of co-transcriptional H3K36me3 by SETD2. We visualize how a histone writer coordinates with the transcription machinery! This is the magnus opus of @MarkertJon https://t.co/g27t5Rw5RY pic.twitter.com/zUoAC31ML9
— Lucas Farnung (@LucasFarnung) December 12, 2024
Cryo-EM workflow, methods and discovery technologies
In 2019-2021 @BrentNannenga and I put together this methods in cryoem book. It was a lot of work. It sells for 120$ and chapter downloads are 35$. The publisher informed us that they had 78,000 downloads so far. Thats several million dollars profit for them...
— Tamir Gonen 🎗️ (@gonenlab) January 17, 2025
We got nothing 😳 pic.twitter.com/i5fXl9II29
Today we got another set of crates … check out the label! 🤗 pic.twitter.com/JQ6z2e6XGn
— Wolf Lab (@HiCryoEM) January 10, 2025
Thrilled to see our work on high-resolution #cryoem using a common LaB6 120-keV TEM and sub–200-keV direct electron detector, now online @ScienceAdvances. https://t.co/WGbo5j3xWO
— Hari Venugopal (@HariVenugopal2) January 6, 2025
. A collaboration with @GatanMicroscopy, @GeorgRamm, and @CryoEM_Monash. pic.twitter.com/JJif0KrKW2
🔬 Tired of dropping CryoEM grids during manipulation? Check out my 3D-printed holder! Download the STL file here: www.printables.com/model/900940.... Compatible with glow discharge systems, it makes your workflow smoother and more efficient. 💡 #CryoEM #3DPrinting #OpenScience
— Louis Rouillan (@lrouillan.bsky.social) January 14, 2025 at 4:06 PM
[image or embed]
For structures determined by cryo-electron microscopy, 2024 was yet again the year of the Gatan Microscopy, with a 'GATAN K3' detector used in ~4000 entries. ~700 entries used a GATAN K2 detector, while FEI Falcon detectors (@thermofishersci.bsky.social) accounted for ~800 entries. 6/11
— Protein Data Bank in Europe (PDBe) (@pdbeurope.bsky.social) January 13, 2025 at 10:43 AM
[image or embed]
This is a fantastic integration of alphafold and fiducial markers applied to small transporter structure determination with #cryoEM. Congrats to @danengw.bsky.social, Nathaniel Traaseth and team. www.nature.com/articles/s41...
— Ed Twomey (@cryoet.bsky.social) January 15, 2025 at 8:26 PM
[image or embed]
Protein production for cryoEM structure determination just got a lot cheaper - high resolution structure from half a plate of HEK cells with the "MIcro ISolation (MISO)" microfluidics-based approach. Congrats to the Brunner and Efremov labs in Brussels! www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
— Lander Lab (@landerlab.bsky.social) January 16, 2025 at 11:57 PM
[image or embed]
KOLs, thoughts and reflections
I just unfollowed everyone. Please unfollow this account too, as it is no longer in use.
— Sjors Scheres (@SjorsScheres) December 23, 2024
We just might be computing our way to better snakebite antivenoms. But there's a lot that remains to be done, and who will pay to do it?
— Derek Lowe (@dereklowe.bsky.social) January 16, 2025 at 9:46 PM
[image or embed]
"I'm kind of an AI skeptic, because I find that the machine learned something, but I didn't." - David DeRosier (paraphrase), at the "Cryo-EM: the next 50 years" symposium.
— Benjamin Bammes (@bbammes.bsky.social) January 11, 2025 at 11:48 PM
You want to build an apparatus for time-resolved cryo-EM? Easy: bio-protocol.org/en/bpdetail?...
— Joachim Frank (@joachim123.bsky.social) January 16, 2025 at 11:23 PM
[image or embed]
Biotech pulse and obesity mania
The @X biotech community is still the most useful for learning, breaking news, and exchanging ideas. Here's a list of thoughtful accounts worth following who have been important in building the community (no particular order):@yaireinhorn@A_May_MD@BioStockAnalyst@BiopharmIQ…
— Biotech Investor (@learnbiotech) December 29, 2024
Not an understatement to say that biotech is headed into 2025 with the most uncertainty it's ever had.
— Brad Loncar (@bradloncar) December 31, 2024
Whatever private (or public for that matter) biotech companies survive 2025 will be unstoppable beasts the likes of which the biotech world has never seen before. It's brutal out there. Godspeed everyone 💪
— Dr. Nicole Paulk (@Nicole_Paulk) December 31, 2024
The bigger question for me is whether VC money is the rate-limiting factor today for innovation... I don't think it is: 10x more VC money available today than a decade ago.
— Bruce Booth (@LifeSciVC) January 10, 2025
Promising science is also abundant, though translational risk remains high. Shiny new "backable" things… https://t.co/sxK3r3Mum1
Classic "platform biotech" problem. Most of the value creation is very far downstream — but that requires additional skills/capabilities/resources that the platform co usually doesn't have — and those parts are hard! https://t.co/iHP32jmzIF
— Frank S. David (@Frank_S_David) January 4, 2025
Top Biotech Partnerships 2024: only 9 with $100M+ upfront….realize how rare and hard that is to achieve…..those kind of deals DO NOT grow on trees. 🌲 $XBI https://t.co/ezOYWB1RM1
— BowTiedBiotech 🧪🔬🧬 (@BowTiedBiotech) January 1, 2025
If I could only bet on one thing in biotech in 2025, I think it would probably be degraders.
— Brad Loncar (@bradloncar) December 30, 2024